Josh Berkus wrote: > KaiGai, > >> A flexible framework is worthwhile for both operating systems. >> Please confirm it to the TS folks. > > Yep, that's the idea. Glenn was fine with your stuff last year, I expect > it'll still be fine. > > Other than SELinux and TrustedSolaris, does anyone know of other role-based > or > multilevel security frameworks we should check against? I'd like to have any > security framework we approve be plug-in adaptable to everything out there.
In the recent news, http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/pr/2008-03/sunflash.20080313.1.xml NSA and SUN announces a new project launched which tries to port FLASK security architecture, it is named as FMAC. It can be a good candidate to host multilevel database security. (SELinux is also based on FLASK security architecture.) SEBSD project is also known. It is a poring of SELinux into BSD platform. SEBSD: http://www.trustedbsd.org/sebsd.html Thanks, -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
