-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:23:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Tom Lane wrote: > >>> The idea that's becoming attractive to me while contemplating the > >>> multiple-maps problem is that we should adopt something similar to > >>> the old Mac OS idea of multiple "forks" in a relation. > > > Can we call them "maps" or "metadata maps"? "forks" sounds weird.
Actually, I do like "forks", but to add a little bit diversity: facets? aspects? FWIW, the idea of mapping a relation to a directory quite compelling. Regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH33c7Bcgs9XrR2kYRAuBQAJ9MjISqgn37umRIydxtUBYONORwDgCbBKkE y7adUy7s/30TxQPQiJZZejA= =PAQ9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
