Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared
for this.
Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the first
couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
Yeah, we expected to have glitches. I think we now have a much better
idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
Yes. I'm not meaning to whine, sorry if it comes over like that. It
looks to me like we need a sort of prep phase for a commit-fest, so the
people switching into commit-fest mode when it starts can do so with
little friction.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
