On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Add to pl/pgsql TODO:
>
>         o Consider invalidating the cache or keeping seperate cached
>           copies when search_path changes
>
>           http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg01009.php

IMO, Tom's idea, namely to keep separate cache plans for various
search_path settings, is a much stronger proposal and should probably
get the 'todo'.

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to