Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uh, I think based on other usage it should be called client_statement().
That is *exactly* the wrong thing, because "statement" specifically means one SQL statement. "client_query" seems about the best compromise I've heard so far. It's too bad we didn't have this debate before pg_stat_activity got out into the wild, because it's now too late to rename its column current_query. Possibly we should stick with current_query() just for consistency with that view ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers