James Mansion wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Yeah, I would be far more interested in this patch if it avoided > > needing SysV shmem at all. The problem is to find an adequate > > substitute for the nattch-based interlock against live children of > > a dead postmaster. > > > > > (confused) Why can't you use mmap of /dev/zero and inherit the fd > into child processes? > (simple enough to do something similar on Win32, even if the > mechanism isn't identical)
This is what we do on win32 today. We don't use the sysv emulation layer anymore. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
