Thomas Swan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFIAK, it's a legal table creation statement.
The variant I showed is. The original one had an extraneous "ON" in the
FOREIGN KEY clause, and even more to the point all the column
declarations had column name and type name reversed. That's why I was
questioning the syntax ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
