On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't to say so plpgpsm is an dialect of plpgsql. Minimally there > are different parser. I am sure so supported functions can be shared, > but it's mean really dramatic changes in plpgsql code. I belive so > separated languages will be more maintainable.
I agree. I think it should be a separate language as well. -- Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
