Perfect, thank you ... i knew I was overlooking something obvious ... the
query just flies now ...
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Try adding ... AND n.nid = 15748 ... to the WHERE.
>
> > n.nid is the note id ... nl.id is the contact id ...
>
> Ooops, I misread "n.nid = nl.nid" as "n.nid = nl.id". Sorry for the
> bogus advice.
>
> Try rephrasing as
>
> FROM (note_links nl JOIN notes n ON (n.nid = nl.nid))
> LEFT JOIN calendar c ON (n.nid = c.nid)
> WHERE ...
>
> The way you were writing it forced the LEFT JOIN to be done first,
> whereas what you want is for the note_links-to-notes join to be done
> first. See
> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.1/postgres/explicit-joins.html
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
