-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


- --On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:10:59 +0200 Magnus Hagander 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> Could it be that a commit was done while the tag operation was running?
> Given that neither is an atomic operation in cvs, and it used to be
> that large repo operations could take quite a long time?

I doubt it, back in 7.1 days, we had something like 4 committers, I think, and 
all core members ... very little chance of overlap ... the weird thing is Peter 
is reporting its *all* on the 7.1 branch ... none of hte others affected ...

- -- 
Marc G. Fournier        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]                              MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFH8/It4QvfyHIvDvMRAqnKAJ4h/+4elPLe3XEfW9lRU6IfAAiSWgCcCRCd
pWs76n1JzLgiOExj6kGytBA=
=XVkS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to