Magnus Hagander wrote: > Was that really the conclusion? My memory of this thread showed that > most people who actually deal with hashes and cryptography *wanted* a > SHA based hash in core (because our users ask for it!) and the only > disagreement was in *what* should be included.
Sorry if it looked like I was jumping to conclusions on this. I was reporting the summary of the comments I had from the patch queue. Based on the subsequent discussion, it seems it was accurate none-the-less. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
