-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
> I think you should conduct a wider survey before you make that decision. > In particular, I'd like to hear from driver writers like Greg Sabino > Mullane and Jeff Davis, as well as regular libpq users. I can state that there would be almost zero chance this would ever be used by DBD::Pg, as it would seem to add overhead with no additional functionality over what we already have. Unless I'm misreading what it does and someone can make the case why I should use it. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200804081349 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkf7sGkACgkQvJuQZxSWSsi8FgCgkGUGh2ieOAtvNlXX6orjO8oc 0bIAoPF7ojxM1c38kw7+L4Ar7FRZmdrn =U2BM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
