-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, April 09, 2008 19:06:30 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:59:43 -0300 > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Damn, this is starting to get to be a trend ... but, I can't but >> agree 100% with this ... we *can* enforce, and I doubt it will have >> much (if any) affect on the # of patches that come in, since ppl want >> to see their work committed, and will follow any *reaonable* >> procedure we have for them to do so ... >> >> Do other large projects accept patches 'ad hoc' like we do? >> FreeBSD? Linux? KDE? >> > > KDE is fairly structured. Linux... I don't know. I do know that at one > time a very well known Alan slammed a very well known Linux for using > his inbox as a patch queue (funny isn't it, no offense Bruce). FreeBSD I > would think you would know better than I. However even Debian for all > of its warts is *very* structured. FreeBSD, *everything* goes through GnATs ... bug reports *and* patches ... - -- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkf9g/4ACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvNRhgCgtxXpF9+9ruMRfOmVBQsHctfe Z2AAoJbKGw05+BAxLaw38MxjiU41dMrS =O5g6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
