> > Still, it's an interesting alternative. Comments anyone?
>
> SelfExclusiveLock is clear and can't be confused with other
> lock types.
How about giving it a label ? SelfExclusive would somehow suggest,
that you can have more than one self exclusive lock.
Like:
lock table atab in self exclusive mode for "vacuum";
does not conflict with:
lock table atab in self exclusive mode for "account balancing";
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
