Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Note that we'll need to add candidate match support to the regular index
>>> scan API as well for that.
>>
>> [ confused... ] Thought you'd done that in this patch?
> No, I only modified the bitmap scan API.
Okay. I applied what you'd done (with minor revisions), but we'll have
to fix up the regular indexscan API before anything can be done about
@@@. I'll take a look at that part tomorrow.
Teodor, do you have any thoughts about exactly how you'd fix @@@ ?
I suppose that the recheck-need is not really a property of specific
tuples, but of a particular query, for that case. Where would you
want to detect that?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
