Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PFC wrote:
>> So, where to go from that ? I don't see a way to implement this without
>> a (backwards-compatible) change to the wire protocol, because the clients
>> will want to specify when a plan should be cached or not. Since the user
>> should not have to name each and every one of the statements they want to
>> use plan caching, I see the following choices :
> I don't understand the point here. We already have cached plans: you
> send a Parse. You can then Bind/Execute many times.
> Maybe what we need is support for this in libpq, so that PHP can use it?
We already have that, too ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
