Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> By the argument that it's better to break things obviously than to >> break them subtly, risking case 4 seems more attractive than risking >> case 2.
> The single thought is: usually, it's very hard to see that query returns more > results that it should be. It doesn't matter for fulltext search (and it has > very good chance to stay unnoticed forever because wrong rows will be sorted > down by ranking function, although performance will decrease. Hmm ... that's a good point. And the performance loss that I'm complaining about is probably not large, unless you've got a *really* expensive operator. Maybe we should leave it as-is. Anybody else have an opinion? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers