Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Maybe this means that we should give pgindent a run over the back >>> branches. >> >> Yea, that thought has crossed our minds, but the problem is that there >> is little testing of back branches so it would be risky.
> That's a fair point, though I wonder how can a code indenter be so > broken that it broke code in ways not detected by our buildfarm. Yeah, the buildfarm has changed that equation a little. I think that if we were going to do something like switch to GNU indent, we'd really have to do that (re-indent the back branches) to maintain our sanity. And again anytime we moved to a new release of indent. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers