"Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> postgres=# explain analyze select ctid, * from pg_class where ctid in (
> '(6,1)' );
> ERROR: could not read block 6 of relation 1663/11511/1259: read only 0 of
> 8192 bytes
I was about to say that throwing an error for this is just fine, but on
closer investigation we didn't throw an error before 8.3; the behavioral
change is because mdread() now throws an error for out-of-bounds read.
So for consistency with historical behavior this probably needs to be
fixed.
> Also, it is known that 0 is not a valid row-offset in the block, but the
> tid input function accepts this value (it rejects -ve values). For the same
> setup:
Not sure what you think needs to be fixed in this case? Again,
backwards compatibility seems a reason not to change it; and I sure
don't see why you'd want to throw an error for this case but not the
other one.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
