On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:26:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > 1. Inexpensive to implement; > 2. Unlikely to break most applications; > 3. Closes off a fairly large class of injection attacks. > > The cost/benefit ratio looks pretty good (unlike the idea that started > this thread...)
That's a much more elegant way of putting what I thought. Thanks, Tom. A -- Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
