-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi -hackers,
In another thread about "GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction", the
debate seems to drift onto query hints. About which the consensus here
is pretty clear and strong, no query hints in PostgreSQL, thanks, or
we're never gonna have a perfect generic planner.
IIRC, I've read here in the past some attempts to begin a proposal on
the topic of data hints, allowing the user to describe his data in a
way ANALYZE can't figure out by itself, as e.g. "this column value is
tied to this other column value in this way".
This could be a materialized column, mutual-exclusive NOT NULLs, or
any multi-columns relationships, as well as "this table is a fact
table", etc.
What do you -hackers think about such a plan:
- assess cases where the planner is failing short of good statistics
- assess data properties SQL does not give us but would be of
interrest
to internals, and at the same time not so difficult to know about
by DBAs
- based on this, prepare a descriptive language of some sort tying
this all in
- implement it in a good way ;)
I'm thinking we could have a new set of commands to tell PostgreSQL
some "high-level" facts about the data, e.g. "there's a injective
function such as f(t.colA) = t.colB" or any useful thing to be found
in the firsts proposed step.
Is there a chance we're gonna improve the planner this way? And answer
Simon's (and many others here and there, -performance etc) concerns?
HTH, regards,
- --
dim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkgeEjoACgkQlBXRlnbh1bnlHwCfcHL5uOlCpptekwLBMp+E9kUn
4roAoMfwdITByHtxCi35l9jDCTSFw2Ho
=whVn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
