Stephen Frost wrote:
Andrew,

* Andrew Dunstan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
For example, because it put *my* address in the list for your message above, it caused my MUA quite correctly to add a To: line to myself, which I certainly didn't want to do.

Honestly, I suspect thunderbird just doesn't know your addresses if
it's adding your address back in.  Adding your address isn't for you-
it's for other people.  The, completely reasonable, assumption is that
if your address was included in a To or Cc that you're not on the list
and stripping that out would mean you'd be left out.

And it's completely unnecessary. For example, I have set my majordomo preferences for the postgresql.org lists not to send me copies of emails where I am also in the To: or Cc: lines. After doing that I get no duplicates.

This doesn't help at all, actually.  As I pointed out previously, I
*want* the mail through the list, what I *don't* want is people sending
list mail directly to me.

And I don't casue anyone else to have to edit the addresses when they reply to my mail.

Are you sure thunderbird recognizes the email address you use for
posting as a local identity/account?  Mutt has a specific 'alternates'
configuration to let it know what addresses are local.

If you want to ensure that you reply to a list, use an MUA that has a reply-to-list command - I see you use mutt, which has such a command IIRC.

Indeed, and it's exactly what I use when replying to list mail.  The
issue isn't making sure that *I* reply to a list, it's asking other
people to reply through the list rather than to me.

        

a. I don't use Thunderbird.
b. Of couse the MUA knows what my address is.
c. Yours are pretty much the *only* settings of all the users of this list that cause me issues. Judging by your own words I am not alone in being thus inconvenienced (otherwise, why would "an amazing number" of people ask you about it?). If you don't care about that then there's nothing much I can do. Alvaro used to have a similar setup. When I complained he very kindly fixed it. d. Your "completely reasonable" assumption above is, of course, bogus. Most people when replying to a list reply to all adresses. Assuming that the non-list addresses are for people not on the list is nonsense.

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to