On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:40 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Robert Treat wrote: > > On Monday 12 May 2008 18:58:37 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > >> Simon Riggs wrote: > >> > >>>> Lastly, not quite related to this output, but in the same general area, > >>>> should we have an option on pg_standby to allow removing the archive > >>>> file after it has been restored? > >>>> > >>> There already is one, but its more complex than that. (%r) > >>> > >> I was using %r. But the WAL files that have been restored (according to > >> the log) are still in the archive dir. So it looks like %r isn't working > >> properly. > >>
> > Are you sure you've moved passed the latest restart point? Just because a > > WAL > > file has been processed doesn't mean it can be deleted. > > > Thanks. It wasn't that, but when I ran with the very latest patches this > problem went away. > Thanks for testing. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers