Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, that list looks reasonably sane. The main thing I was worried >> about was not plastering PostgreSQL markers on files that are simply >> imported from an upstream source, like the zic database and the >> libstemmer files.
> The following files have markers from upstream systems. I'm not sure > that means we don't want to add $PostgreSQL$ markers, though. Thoughts? > ./src/port/strlcat.c:/* $OpenBSD: strlcat.c,v 1.13 2005/08/08 08:05:37 > espie Exp $ */ > ./src/backend/port/darwin/system.c: * $FreeBSD: > src/lib/libc/stdlib/system.c,v 1.6 2000/03/16 02:14:41 jasone Exp $ > ./contrib/pgcrypto/rijndael.h:/* $OpenBSD: rijndael.h,v 1.3 > 2001/05/09 23:01:32 markus Exp $ */ I don't have an objection to putting markers on these files, because as far as I know we're maintaining them as if they were our own source. The zic and libstemmer files are different because they are not intended to be maintained in-house --- we're just gonna download and mass-update from time to time. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers