* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > When we noticed this recently, my digging suggested you'll be hard pressed > > to have a RedHat system now without those two installed. > > Indeed, I've not heard any squawks from the field yet. It's still > wrong though ...
Unsuprisingly, half the world in Debian also depends on libxml2, but I agree 110% w/ Tom- it's wrong, and I feel it really ought to be fixed regardless. It's entirely likely that there will come a time when it's a less used library getting pulled in, too. I also personally hate useless clutter in dependencies as it can cause package management headaches.. After poking around a bit I did find a box that only pulled in libxml2 for subversion, and we've been talking about moving to a different SCM (which don't appear to depend on libxml2), so it might eventually only be pulled in by psql for us. Not a show-stopper, but it's also not completely out of the question that it'll get pulled in unnecessairly. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature