Tom Lane wrote: > > Just for kicks, I've applied this patch so you, so you get to be on > > the receiving side of that ;-) > > No objection here. > > I noticed that you applied the patch to 8.2 as well. It should be > harmless enough, but we weren't having the problem in 8.2 were we? > Or am I just confused?
I think the underlying problem is still there, it's just that it doesn't manifest itself in a crash here. I figured it couldn't hurt to fix it in that case. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
