Alex Hunsaker wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am wondering if it's a good idea to hide the redundant entries > > to reduce clutter in the pg_settings display. (We could do this > > by adding a "hidden" boolean to struct config_enum_entry.) > > Thoughts? > > +1 > > > regards, tom lane > > Maybe something like the attached patch?
Oops, missed that there was a patch posted already. Looks like the way to do it (except I'd move the comment :-P) if that's the way we go. > I looked into just making it a string so we could use parse_bool... > because backslash_quote seems to be the exception not the rule. But I > decided having a hidden flag seems more useful anyway... It used to be a string. We don't want that, because then we can't tell the client which possible values are available. That's the whole reason for the creation of the enum type gucs... //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
