Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> I notice that the PGAC_CHECK_GETTEXT macro already contains the comment > >> dnl FIXME: We should probably check for version >=0.10.36. > >> So depending on what that's about, there might be some other good > >> reasons to go with choice #2. Peter, it appears you put that comment in > >> when you first added the macro, on 2001-06-02. Do you remember why? > > > I think that was the first version that worked sanely in general. > > Hmm. Bruce, what gettext version are you running exactly, and how much > have you ever tested the localization behavior with it?
Uh, I can't seem to find the libintl version --- my bet is that it was installed as part of another package but I am not sure which one. I have never used it to test localization support so turning it off is fine --- I just enabled it to catch compile failures. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
