Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The RPM packages have done this since approximately forever. You might >> want to look at the patches used there.
> yes [1] is the same that we have been using internally. > Let me reformulate my question: would it be better to include something > like the attached patch in PostgreSQL, than have every distributor of > the tests apply it? > [1] > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/postgresql/F-9/postgresql-test.patch?rev=1.3&view=auto I never particularly thought it would be useful to push that patch upstream, but certainly it would make life a tad simpler for Devrim and me. Since nobody else has objected, I'll look into doing this in HEAD. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
