Tom Lane wrote: > So what I'd like to do about it is just use the CASCADE style all the > time. Thoughts?
It is loss of functionality, but I very much doubt anyone is depending on it -- it's way too elaborate. +1 on doing the simpler report if it's too expensive to build the full report. > BTW, it would now be possible to do something like what the shdepend > code does, and stuff all these reports into the DETAIL field of a > single message, instead of emitting them as separate notices. > Any feelings pro or con about that? I think it makes more sense to do it that way (considering that they're really part of the single error message, not independent reports), but there's the problem that the error report gets too long. So we would have to send a truncated report to the client and the full report to the log only. Would people be upset at that? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
