"Greg Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) Is it worthwhile to expand the information stored in the GUC structure to > make it better capable of supporting machine generation and to provide more > information for tool authors via pg_settings? The exact fields that should or > shouldn't be included remains controversial; consider "default value", > "per-session/runtime/restart", and "enum lists" as the list of things that are > most needed there.
Isn't that a list of what's *already* there? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
