Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Actually, now that I try it, it seems that the MediaWiki markup is not > completely helpful here -- right now, on some items we have a one-line > "header" and then possibly a longer description, and it seems the only > way to do that in MediaWiki is like this: > > * Set proper permissions on non-system schemas during db creation<br> > Currently all schemas are owned by the super-user because they are copied > from the template1 database. However, since all objects are inherited from > the template database, it is not clear that setting schemas to the db owner > is correct. > > Note the dumb <br> thing in the middle. > > Personally I find that ugly enough as to be unacceptable; what do others > think?
How about using "definition lists"? //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
