Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I agree with that for pg_clog and friends, but I'm much more leery of >> folding WAL into the same framework.
> Well it may still be worthwhile stealing buffers from shared_buffers even if > we set a special flag marking them as owned by WAL and out of bounds for > the normal buffer manager. > At least that way we could always steal more if we want or return some, as > long as we're careful about when we do it. ... and as long as you can acquire the WAL per-buffer management space out of nowhere ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers