Michael Meskes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:26:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Makefile.shlib builds these in the distprep action, so I suppose > > they're supposed to be there. libpq .cvsignore's its equivalent > > files, so I'd agree with doing that. It looks like there should be > > three such files in each directory, though, not just one? There are three -- two of them are .cvsignore'd. Should we just .cvsignore the third one, or remove it from the build, or ...? libpq has the three of them in .cvsignore so I guess this is what ecpg should do as well. > Well, in my source tree I have two, one for MS VC++ and one for Borland > C++ Builder. And yes, I can build a third one for MS VC++ as well by > just issuing the corresponding make call. However, I have no idea > whether we need both, the only differ in the lib name: > --- libecpgddll.def 2008-06-20 12:33:29.000000000 +0200 > +++ libecpgdll.def 2008-06-20 12:33:16.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > ; DEF file for MS VC++ > -LIBRARY LIBECPGD > +LIBRARY LIBECPG > EXPORTS > ECPGallocate_desc @ 1 > ECPGconnect @ 2 > > Maybe someone with more Windows knowledge can explain this? Magnus? The weird thing is that the three files are generated for me unconditionally (of course, I didn't issue a specific make call). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
