Marc Munro wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> The statement:
>
> revoke all on view internal.all_objects from public;
>
> yields a syntax error. The docs show that the word "view" is not
> acceptable in this statement which is fine but the surprising thing is
> that:
>
> ? revoke all on table internal.all_objects from public;
>
> works fine even though all_objects is a view and not a table.
>
> Now that I know about it, this doesn't bother me but it was a surprise
> and I wonder whether the the parser/planner/whatever should be a bit
> smarter about allowing the word table to apply to non-tables, and
> whether the word view ought to be allowed.
Yes, I can confirm this behavior on CVS HEAD, and it is odd:
test=> CREATE SCHEMA internal;
CREATE SCHEMA
test=> CREATE VIEW internal.all_objects AS SELECT 1;
CREATE VIEW
test=> REVOKE ALL ON VIEW internal.all_objects FROM PUBLIC;
ERROR: syntax ERROR AT OR near "internal"
LINE 1: REVOKE ALL ON VIEW internal.all_objects FROM PUBLIC;
^
test=> REVOKE ALL ON TABLE internal.all_objects FROM PUBLIC;
REVOKE
Is there a downside to adding "VIEW" in parser/gram.y:privilege_target?
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
