"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/26/08, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BTW, I don't think you can use that same-length optimization for
>> citext.  There's no reason to think that upper/lowercase pairs will
>> have the same length all the time in multibyte encodings.

> What about this code in current str_tolower():

>         /* Output workspace cannot have more codes than input bytes */
>         workspace = (wchar_t *) palloc((nbytes + 1) * sizeof(wchar_t));

That's working with wchars, not bytes.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to