Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Well, yeah, but that seems a very long way off.  In the meantime a lot
>> of people use the existing pgfoundry citext module.

> Indeed, but why isn't this code put there as well?

Well, actually, that might be the best thing to do with it.  But it
would be sensible to give it a code review anyway, no?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to