On Jul 7, 2008, at 17:18, Tom Lane wrote:
No, but you were: you proposed using strncmp for everything.
Yes, that's right. I was trying to understand why I wouldn't use just one or the other. And the answer turned out to be, you wouldn't, except that strncmp() is an desirable optimization for = and <>. So I've changed only those.
Phew, I think I'm clear now. Thanks! DAvid -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
