On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:58 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Have received exactly zero feedback on the question of whether I should > be assigning reviewers to "WIP" patches or not.
I suppose it depends on what exactly "WIP" means, but I should think that if work is still "in progress", the patch is not ready to be reviewed yet. Patches that are truly WIP probably shouldn't be candidates for a commit fest until they are finished, anyway. BTW, the pg_dump lock timeout patch was previously listed as "WIP", but I think it is better classified as "waiting for response". Waiting for a reviewer's comments to be incorporated into a new version of the patch should be a distinct state from waiting for the initial version of the patch to be completed. -Neil -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
