I was wondering, if there is any real advantage to actually specify say
64 for the maxrows parameter to the Execute message in the PostgreSQL
network protocol?
I.e.:
- Is it easier on the server, because it somehow uses less total memory when
batching the Executes with 64 rows at a time?
- Is it better for latency when expecting notices/notifies in between?
- Is it simply slowing down the protocol because every 64 rows I
introduce a round-trip delay for the next PortalSuspended/Execute combo?
Please note that we're only running the query once, I'm just batching
the results with the Execute maxrows parameter.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Limited offer: Pacemakers, with a unique life-time warranty
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
