At 2008-07-09 15:11:25 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> No, actually I meant having a lone "list = lappend(list, newseq);" in
> the loop, so that ExecGrantStmt_oids is called only once.
Yes, I understand what you meant. I just phrased my agreement poorly.
Here's a more precise phrasing. ;-)
(I agree with Robert Treat that there seems to be no point granting
SELECT on the sequence. I don't *particularly* care about it, but I
tend towards wanting to drop that bit. This patch reflects that.)
Jaime: please feel free to use or ignore this, as you wish.
-- ams
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c b/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c
index 15f5af0..8664203 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c
@@ -361,6 +361,41 @@ ExecuteGrantStmt(GrantStmt *stmt)
}
ExecGrantStmt_oids(&istmt);
+
+ /* If INSERT or UPDATE privileges are being granted or revoked on a
+ * relation, this extends the operation to include any sequences
+ * owned by the relation.
+ */
+
+ if (istmt.objtype == ACL_OBJECT_RELATION &&
+ (istmt.privileges & (ACL_INSERT | ACL_UPDATE)))
+ {
+ InternalGrant istmt_seq;
+
+ istmt_seq.is_grant = istmt.is_grant;
+ istmt_seq.objtype = ACL_OBJECT_SEQUENCE;
+ istmt_seq.grantees = istmt.grantees;
+ istmt_seq.grant_option = istmt.grant_option;
+ istmt_seq.behavior = istmt.behavior;
+ istmt_seq.all_privs = false;
+
+ istmt_seq.privileges = ACL_NO_RIGHTS;
+ if (istmt.privileges & ACL_INSERT)
+ istmt_seq.privileges |= ACL_USAGE;
+ if (istmt.privileges & ACL_UPDATE)
+ istmt_seq.privileges |= ACL_UPDATE;
+
+ istmt_seq.objects = NIL;
+ foreach (cell, istmt.objects)
+ {
+ istmt_seq.objects =
+ list_concat(istmt_seq.objects,
+
getOwnedSequences(lfirst_oid(cell)));
+ }
+
+ if (istmt_seq.objects != NIL)
+ ExecGrantStmt_oids(&istmt_seq);
+ }
}
/*
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
