Le Monday 21 July 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit : > Cédric Villemain wrote: > > Le Monday 21 July 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit : > >> I think we should differentiate between "infinite" and "unknown" in the > >> return value of get_stack_depth_limit(), and use max_stack_depth of 2MB > >> in case of infinite, and fall back to the 100kB only in the unknown > >> case. > > > > Why 2MB ? I believed that 3.5MB is the effective good maximum , is that > > too much ? > > 2MB is the value we set max_stack_depth to, unless getrlimit() says that > the actual stack limit is lower than that. > > I believe the 2MB figure is just an arbitrary value, thought to be quite > safe, but also high enough that most people won't need to raise it. > Before we started to use getrlimit(), we used to just default > max_stack_depth=2MB.
Ok, thank you for the explanation. > > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Cédric Villemain Administrateur de Base de Données Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53 http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
