On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Matthew T. O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is DSM going to be in 8.4? The last I had heard, DSM+related >> improvements weren't close to being guaranteed for this release. If >> it doesn't make it, waiting another year and a half for something >> easily fixed would be fairly unacceptable. Should I provide a patch >> in the event that DSM doesn't make it? > > Can't hurt to submit a patch. Also, could you do something to help mitigate > the worse case, something like don't update the stats in pg_class if the > analyze finishes after a vacuum has finished since the current analyze > started?
Yeah, I was thinking about that. It should actually be very easy to do that. -Jonah -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
