>>>>> "Gregory" == Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gregory> I just wonder where all these examples of real-world queries Gregory> were when I posted this patch and asked for such feedback Gregory> originally. sigh. Gregory> In any case I think we've already made this decision. If we Gregory> wanted the 80% solution it was ready for Postgres 8.3. It Gregory> wouldn't make much sense to skip it then but put it in now Gregory> when that there's time to finish it and a lot of the work's Gregory> already done. I wasn't paying much attention in the 8.3 development phases so I have no idea what patch you had then. The patch under review is for WITH RECURSIVE, not just for WITH, and it handles a large enough proportion of the use-cases for recursive queries (I've never seen a requirement for mutual recursion in the wild, though I've several times had to kludge around pg lack of recursion support) that I think it should be included in 8.4 either as-is, or with whatever improvements are possible between now and release. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
