"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Am Tuesday, 29. July 2008 schrieb Greg Sabino Mullane: >>> What's not stable about having Python 2.5? > >> I mean "stable" to mean "does not change (unnecessarily)". > > I really don't understand Peter's objection here. This thread has > already consumed more person-time than I spent on applying the > back-patch.
Well I certainly wouldn't expect us to feel obligated to spend much effort making 8.1 work with a new Redhat release, for example. We would just say 8.1 is only supported on those systems it was supported on when it was released. But if you're happy doing the work I can't see any reason to stop you either. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
