"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> (I think it's better to reuse the same postmaster executable, because >> that way it's easier to have the same parsing routines.)
> Change that to pg_ctl and you have a deal :) Did you not understand Alvaro's point? Putting this functionality into pg_ctl will result in huge code bloat, because it will have to duplicate a lot of code that already exists inside the postgres executable. I don't object to having a pg_ctl option to call "postgres --check", but I do object to maintaining two copies of the same code. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers