Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Does anyone see a need for having TOAST tables be individually > > configurable for autovacuum? I've finally come around to looking at > > being able to use ALTER TABLE for autovacuum settings, and I'm wondering > > if we need to support that case. > > It seems like we'll want to do it somehow. Perhaps the cleanest way is > to incorporate toast-table settings in the reloptions of the parent > table. Otherwise dump/reload is gonna be a mess.
Yeah, Magnus was suggesting this syntax: ALTER TABLE foo SET toast_autovacuum_enable = false; and the like. My question is whether there is interest in actually having support for this, or should we just inherit the settings from the main table. My gut feeling is that this may be needed in some cases, but perhaps I'm overengineering the thing. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
