On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since I am about to add a "bulk delete" routine to the index access
> method APIs for concurrent VACUUM, I need to add a column to pg_am
> to define the associated procedure for each index AM. This seems like
> a fine time to clean up some of the other outstanding TODO items for
> pg_am:
>
> Note that this doesn't address Oleg's concerns about haskeytype,
> lossiness, etc. AFAICS those issues are not related to the contents
> of pg_am. Later on, I am going to have some proposals for altering
> pg_opclass and related tables to deal with those issues...
Any chance you'd untie a knot for our development in 7.2 development
cycle ? Our code for multikey GiST, Btree is more or less complete
and work with ugly workaround, and the only thing we need is a
solution of the problem with index_formtuple.
>
> Comments? Any other festering problems in this immediate area?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
