"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think everyone agrees that partial vacuums would be useful / *A Good > Thing* but it's the implementation that is the issue.
I'm not sure how important it will really be once we have support for dead-space-map-driven vacuum. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers