Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> There may >> be no very good way to do that without maintaining some shared state, >> ie the last page handed out.
> We could put an extra field on the FSM root page. Hmm, it doesn't > actually need to be a single global field, so we could have a field like > that on every FSM page, for better concurrency. Yeah, that would work, and it is only a hint so you needn't WAL-log changing it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers